Re: Environment variables for remote processes

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I think it's basically the same situation as with setq: either it's done
> within a `let' (and we're back to the let-binding case), or it affects
> all subsequent subprocesses.

Well, a pushed a respective patch to the trunk. Seems to work at least
fine with `eshell' and `shell', which are not trivial examples.

Let's see, whether other people start to rant.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.