Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.

[Paul Eggert]

Daniel Colascione wrote:
> It's programmable in Lisp. Lisp stack overflows shouldn't kill Emacs.
> I'm suggesting that we shouldn't care about *C* stack overflows.

The Lisp stack *is* the C stack. There is just one stack, which can overflow in 
module code or in Elisp interpreter code (or in library code or whatever). 
Whatever technique is used to detect Lisp stack overflows, should be usable to 
detect stack overflows in module calls.