Re: Making `interactive' conditional

[Stefan Monnier]

> Stefan's arguments against not being able to discover commands for
> not-read-only-buffers in read-only buffers were good, but that was,
> after all, not the original proposal.

Indeed.

> Are anybody against that idea?

Not me.

>> I'd still love to see a faster, more apropos M-x develop in ELPA, if
>> anyone is interested in making that happen.
> The commands need instrumentation, one way or another, and that has to
> happen in Emacs, not in ELPA.

Of course, for a proof of concept, the new package could come with
(lots of) things like

   (newMx-describe-package "smerge-"
     smerge-mode
     smerge-makeup-conflict)

And then those "instrumentations" could be moved/added to core as
a second step.


        Stefan