[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member inconsistency?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: member inconsistency? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:15:57 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:25:42 +0100
> Cc: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>,
> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>,
> Johan Bockgård <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> Stephen Berman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Oh, thanks for the pointer. So the patch I proposed reverts a change
> > Stefan deliberately made more than eight years ago.
>
> IMHO that change was wrong. It made CHECK_LIST_CONS a no-op, and there
> was nothing wrong with it before Stefan's change.
But given that we've lived with it for more than 8 years, the revert
should have been done on master, not the release branch, IMO.
- Re: member inconsistency?, (continued)
- Re: member inconsistency?, Andreas Schwab, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Johan Bockgård, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/28
- Re: member inconsistency?, Andreas Schwab, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?, Stephen Berman, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: member inconsistency?, John Wiegley, 2016/01/29
- Re: member inconsistency?, Richard Stallman, 2016/01/29