[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asynchronous DNS
From: |
Alain Schneble |
Subject: |
Re: Asynchronous DNS |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:49:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Alain Schneble <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> What happens if background thread(s) are still alive (e.g. blocking,
>> waiting for a network response) and Emacs is killed? Will it wait for
>> the background threads to terminate or will it forcibly kill them?
>
> I'm guessing they'll die along with Emacs. That's what happens with
> threads started by libraries currently, I think.
If so, depending on how network resources are used, it may not release
them properly. They /might/ be released while the process is being
stopped. But will they be released in any case? After all, it sounds a
bit awkward to rely on such a behavior even if it would just work.
Doesn't it?
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, (continued)
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/21
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/20
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/15
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/05
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/04
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/04
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/05
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/02
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/02
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/02
- Re: Asynchronous DNS,
Alain Schneble <=
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/02
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/02
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Yuri Khan, 2016/02/03
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/03