[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TRAMP improvements
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: TRAMP improvements |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:03:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philippe Vaucher <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
Hi Philippe,
> The discussion eventually resulted with someone making a lot of
> suggestions on how TRAMP should be, what was done "wrong" in it, etc.
> When suggested to communicate upstream, the person was not interested
> at all but showed a paste of custom hacks with comments suggesting
> areas where TRAMP could be improved... I kept this paste aside and I
> fell on it today so I'm sending it, in the hope it helps improving
> TRAMP.
Thanks for this!
> I know the tone of the paste is not very constructive, please try to
> see past it and focus on the ideas/leads mentionned instead.
No problem. It's not the first time I'm flamed because of Tramp ...
> Here is the paste: http://sprunge.us/NGJM?cl
>
> Maybe some or all of these comments are not relevant anymore, maybe
> the ideas are not really good ideas after all, or maybe it'd be too
> much work to implement some of the ideas... but I thought that it's
> for emacs-devel to decide.
>
> If there are ideas worth considering, it's probably a good idea to
> start new threads for each ideas, assuming they need somewhat deep
> discussions.
I will go through case by case. After a first look, some of the problems
are fixed indeed, some other comments need more investigation.
I have added also <address@hidden>, since this is the primary
discussion list for Tramp issues.
> Kind regards,
> Philippe
Best regards, Michael.
- TRAMP improvements, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/18
- Re: TRAMP improvements,
Michael Albinus <=