[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:13:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Besides, at this point it borders on technical malpractice to suggest
>> to users that it's OK to use Windows 9x to run Emacs.
>
> How can this be a malpractice, technical or otherwise?
Windows 9X is a virus magnet and reservoir. This is bad for the user of
that machine and for everyone else on the 'net. That's the technical
part. The moral part needs not to be mentioned on this list.
I wholeheartedly agree with Paul on his response.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08