[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2017 05:34:50 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:01:29 -0500
> Cc: Emacs development discussions <address@hidden>
>
> >>>>> "JB" == Jordon Biondo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> JB> Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be
> JB> happy to update the patch from the previous thread.
>
> I wouldn't mind having them be consistent, if only because it makes it easier
> to switch between them, and there is nothing necessary about the
> inconsistency. Eli?
No objections.
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Tino Calancha, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, John Wiegley, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/08
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/10