Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 02.02.2017 22:24, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> I think we are all agreed that Emacs should handle correctly formed
> comments in C.  comment-cache does correctly handle comments, and it has
> been shown to be essentially no slower than master.

Alan, you seem to have abandoned the previous discussion. Why don't we 
finish it first?

You have been asked for some extra measurements, including the ones 
using the alternative patch. I still haven't seen those yet.