[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flymake refactored
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Flymake refactored |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Oct 2017 18:48:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2017-10-07, at 15:37, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Similarly the LaTeX backend would naturally fit in tex-mode.el.
>> Please no. What about AUCTeX users?
>
> AUCTeX can (require 'tex-mode) and then use that function.
>
> AUCTeX and tex-mode should share more code anyway (IIUC they already
> share font-lock rules, at least to the extent that you can use tex-mode
> font-lock rules in AUCTeX, tho AUCTeX also comes with its own font-lock
> rules that you can use instead).
OK, I didn't know that.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- Re: Flymake refactored, (continued)
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/08
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/09
- [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/09
- [PATCH] Re: Flymake refactored, Lele Gaifax, 2017/10/09
- Re: Flymake refactored, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: Flymake refactored, John Wiegley, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/06
- Re: Flymake refactored, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, Mark Oteiza, 2017/10/07
- Re: Flymake refactored, João Távora, 2017/10/08