Re: `thunk-let'?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden> writes:

> > Maybe a better option is to add a `require` in the expansion of
> > lazy-let?

But then we need to wrap it in `eval-and-compile' because we want to
expand the (macro) `thunk-delay' that appears in the expansion at
compile time.

Attached is the cumulative patch doing that.

0001-Add-macros-lazy-let-and-lazy-let.patch
Description: Text Data

Thanks,

Michael.