[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pcase-if-let?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: pcase-if-let? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2018 02:21:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Davis Herring <address@hidden> writes:
> > '(let* () then)
>
> This is obviously a typo for
>
> `(let* () ,then)
Yes, thanks.
> but why not use
>
> then
Took it from the implementation of `if-let'. AFAICT it can make indeed
make a difference in some situations. Doesn't the empty `let*' create a
new lexical environment? Then the scope of a `defvar' without value is
different, for example.
Michael.
- pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Davis Herring, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/30
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/30