[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:49:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "RS" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>> Is it ok if all lisp files are under GLP 2 or later?
> That question has multiple possible meanings. But each meaning
> results in the conclusion that we could do what we need to do.
> 1, If we get the programs listing GNU GPL 2 or later as the license,
> we can change them to say GPL 3 or later, which is simply dropping the
> GPL 2 option. Anyone can do that.
> 2. If we get copyright assignments for that code, which we would want
> in order to put them in GNU ELPA, we can relicense them. We would
> relicense them to GPL 3 or later.
Thanks, a couple of more question, if you don't mind:
1. Does GPL 2 or *later* mean:
a. GPL 2 and all version of that License
that were released *before* GPL 2?. That seems to me the most
logical interpretation.
b. Or does it mean: GPL 2 and all versions that will be released,
*after* the release of GPL 2? That seems like a blank check to
me.
2. I searched all lisp files: some have GPL 3+ some have GPL2+.
Is this ok, or need all files to be under the same license?
3. The person form Debian suggested to have a LICENSE file in the
directory specifying the license for all files in
directories/subdirectories. Is this enough, or need all files to
be listed in that LICENSE file?
Sorry, maybe this is all elementary, but I admit I never really paid much
attention to these details for GPL (any version seemed to be fine)
regards
--
Warning: Content may be disturbing to some audiences
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the NATO membership of the Ukraine.
I support the EU membership of the Ukraine.
https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/addon/gmail-conversation-view/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/08
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Yuchen Pei, 2023/07/08
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/09
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/07/10
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/11
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/12
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/16
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Uwe Brauer, 2023/07/17
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/07/17
- Re: is GPL2 or later enough for having a package in ELPA?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/18