[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jan 2024 23:23:47 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I was referring to what "pred" in `pcase' does:
> ‘(pred FUNCTION)’
> Matches if the predicate FUNCTION returns non-‘nil’ when called on
> EXPVAL. The test can be negated with the syntax ‘(pred (not
> FUNCTION))’. The predicate FUNCTION can have one of the following
> forms:
Ok. Given that for comparison, what conclusion or suggestion to you
offer about cond*?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/01
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/06
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/08
- map seq and radix-tree-leaf, in pcase, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/10
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/12
- Re: cond*, Adam Porter, 2024/01/13
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/15