[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jan 2024 22:50:46 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
(symbolp x) is simpler and more natural than the pcase equivalent,
which I believe would be (and (pred symbolp) x). People seem to have
accepted the latter, without criticizing it as unnatural. I think
they will accept (symbolp x) also. I think that people will get used
to this once they start actually using cond*.
To require use of the more complex `constrain' form even for the
common simple cases would make cond* less convenient for real. I
don't think it would be wise to create a real drawback to eliminate a
mere perception of a drawback.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/04
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/06
- Re: [External] : Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- RE: [External] : Re: cond*, Drew Adams, 2024/01/08
- map seq and radix-tree-leaf, in pcase, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/10
- Re: cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cond*, Adam Porter, 2024/01/13
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/15
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/13
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/14
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02