Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp`

[João Távora]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:55 PM Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> That's right: for compatibility reasons, I think we have to support the
> `funcall` case for the foreseeable future (and really, it costs very
> little to do so)

Does it? Doesn't it basically amount to ad-hoc 'eval' with all the
static analysis/type propagation/etc dream-shattering?

João