Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>,  eller.helmut@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:48:17 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com,  eller.helmut@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:21:19 +0800
> >> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Even if that is true, how does this matter after Emacs crashed?
> >> > Especially if that happened due to MPS assertion violation?
> >> 
> >> bt is called in plenty of situations besides an irrecoverable crash.
> >
> > Which obviously means we should modify "xbacktrace" to notice when
> > Emacs has crashed, and act accordingly.
> 
> Would it perhaps be an idea to let emacs_abort put MPS in pm state?

Maybe, but not all aborts are GC-related.

I think more important is to do this inside SEGV handler.