Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> In any case, I asked about the downsides of calling igc_postmorten,
> which I think is crucial to understand for making this decision.  If
> there are no significant downsides, then doing so is a net win, no?

Isn't the downside that GC will never function again, and become unsafe
to invoke, after a call to igc_postmortem?  With the result that the
debuggee will not be usable as an editor, or indeed operate reliably at
all, after bt is called?

  
https://memory-pool-system.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topic/arena.html#c.mps_arena_postmortem