Re: Declaring Lisp function types

[Stefan Monnier]

> Here we go, I pushed on 'scratch/lisp-func-type-decls' the
> implementation of what we discussed with a doc entry.  Any suggestion or
> is it okay for master?

Looks pretty good, but I wish the symbol property's name would make it
clear it's talking about the type of what's in the symbol's "function
cell" rather than any other role the symbol may be playing as well.
So maybe `function-type` instead of `declared-type`?


        Stefan