Re: Declaring Lisp function types

[Andrea Corallo]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> Here we go, I pushed on 'scratch/lisp-func-type-decls' the
>> implementation of what we discussed with a doc entry.  Any suggestion or
>> is it okay for master?
>
> Looks pretty good, but I wish the symbol property's name would make it
> clear it's talking about the type of what's in the symbol's "function
> cell" rather than any other role the symbol may be playing as well.
> So maybe `function-type` instead of `declared-type`?

Right, done now :)

  Andrea