[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?
From: |
Jos'h Fuller |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Tangling without clutter? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:39:49 +0000 |
Hi!
> Does the :no-expand header argument do what you want? See
> http://orgmode.org/manual/no_002dexpand.html#no_002dexpand.
I tried using it like this:
#+name: function-demo
#+begin_src python :exports both :noweb yes :results output :no-expand
<<function-definition>>
print entable([["One", 2, 59],["Four", 5, 27], ["Seven", 8, 9]])
#+end_src
But it didn't seem to affect the results at all. I may be using it wrong, the
documentation is a bit sparse, without any examples...
It seems like I almost need some variant of the "tangle" argument to :noweb
where syntax references are expanded for evaluation, but not for anything else.
Thanks for taking a look!
Jos'h
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas S. Dye [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:23 PM
> To: Jos'h Fuller
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Tangling without clutter?
>
> Jos'h Fuller <Jos'address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I was writing some documentation about how to use a Python function,
> so I decided to try the tangling feature. However, the result, when
> exported to PDF, is unsatisfactory because the referenced code block is
> included twice -- first in the original location, then again where I
> referenced it with <<function-definition>>.
> >
> > This is, of course, exactly what it needs to do to be able to execute
> the code properly and show the result. But it doesn't look nice. Is
> there any way to suppress the second printing inside the function-demo
> block?
> >
> > If this isn't clear from the example below, I can provide examples of
> the duplication in action as well as what I'd like the output to look
> like.
> >
> > Thanks very much!
> >
> > Example file:
> > #+TITLE: Tangle Test
> > #+LANGUAGE: en
> > #+OPTIONS: H:3 num:nil toc:nil \n:nil @:t ::t |:t ^:nil -:t f:t *:t
> <:t
> > #+OPTIONS: TeX:t LaTeX:t skip:nil d:nil todo:t pri:nil tags:not-in-
> toc
> >
> > * Tangled Code
> > I want to show the definition of a function first:
> > #+name: function-definition
> > #+begin_src python :tangle yes :exports code
> > def entable(data):
> > if not data: return "/No data./"
> >
> > columns = len(data[0])
> > sizes = [0,]*columns
> > for row in data:
> > sizes = [max(x) for x in zip(sizes, [len(str(t)) for t in
> row])]
> >
> > format = "| " + " | ".join(["%%%ds" % x for x in sizes])+" |"
> > return "\n".join([format % tuple(row) for row in data])
> > #+end_src
> >
> > Now I want to show a demonstration of how the function might be
> > called. I need the function to be included so that demonstration
> > code can be executed, but I don't want to include the function
> > definition twice:
> >
> > #+name: function-demo
> > #+begin_src python :tangle yes :exports both :noweb yes :results
> output
> > <<function-definition>>
> >
> > print entable([["One", 2, 3],["Four", 5, 6], ["Seven", 8, 9]])
> > #+end_src
> >
> > Which gives us this result:
> >
> > #+results: function-demo
> > : | One | 2 | 3 |
> > : | Four | 5 | 6 |
> > : | Seven | 8 | 9 |
> >
> >
> Aloha!
>
> Does the :no-expand header argument do what you want? See
> http://orgmode.org/manual/no_002dexpand.html#no_002dexpand.
>
> hth,
> Tom
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com
- [O] Tangling without clutter?, Jos'h Fuller, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Thomas S. Dye, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?,
Jos'h Fuller <=
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Eric Schulte, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Jos'h Fuller, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Eric Schulte, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Jos'h Fuller, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Eric Schulte, 2012/03/14
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Viktor Rosenfeld, 2012/03/15
- Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?, Jacek Generowicz, 2012/03/15