Re: [O] Extending org-contacts with properties: naming properties

[Robert Horn]

Karl Voit writes:

> * David Rogers <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that this kind of simple thing looks like a better
>> idea. However, it would also be nice to be able to call it some name
>> where a person who encounters the software capability but doesn't yet
>> know what it's for will understand what it's for just from reading the
>> name. 
>
> This is my goal, yes.
>
>> "Given" is simple and sounds clear, but it doesn't say who did the
>> giving so the clarity is over-rated. "CustomerInfoIGaveThem" is a bit
>> long. :) (and TheirRecordOfMe is hardly any better.) :)
>

My first reaction was to use a short sentence like "itoldthem".  I can't
think of any single english word that doesn't also need a subject to
describe which direction the transfer went.

R Horn