Re: [O] [patch, ox-latex] better hyperref and title options

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:


>> However, since they are plain strings something like \alpha will be
>> exported as $\backslash$lpha.  I can kind of get it interpreting using
>> org-element-parse-secondary-string, but this is not the right
>> approach.
>
> Why isn't it the right approach?

'Cause usually org-export-data gives you the right value automatically.
Anyway, I don't mind using  org-element-parse-secondary-string.

>> Is there a reason why DESCRIPTION and KEYWORDS can't have formatting?
>
> DESCRIPTION could be moved to `org-element-document-properties'. But
> then, we need to introduce `org-export-with-description', which implies
> export back-ends have to deal with it somehow (ATM "ox-ascii" ignores
> it).

> Another option is to simply remove DESCRIPTION from "ox.el" and let
> export back-ends in need of it to add it to their definition.

I don't oppose that.

> However, I don't see why KEYWORDS should accept markup. I also think it
> should be moved to back-end definitions instead of "ox.el".

Keywords should also be printed in the document as well IMO, e.g. after
the abstract.  An example of where you need markup: σ-algebra.

—Rasmus

-- 
Slowly unravels in a ball of yarn and the devil collects it