[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] BeOrg

From: Thomas S. Dye
Subject: Re: [O] BeOrg
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:30:56 -1000
User-agent: mu4e 1.0-alpha2; emacs 25.3.1

Aloha all
Peter Davis writes:

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

I think you are missing the point. Free software is primarily about
source code (the four definitions).

If we refuse to provide useful information just because it violates some purist idea of what is or is not acceptably unencumbered, then we’re just denying users potential helpful capabilities that may make the difference between using org-mode or abandoning it completely in favor
of some commercial, cross-platform solution.

IIUC, the question is about where to provide this information, not whether or not to provide it. OP asked about putting it in the Org manual and Nicolas has pointed out that the manual is for documenting Org software.

Perhaps Worg is a better place to provide information about BeOrg?


Thomas S. Dye

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]