[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: command-line-args
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: command-line-args |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 05:18:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 04:13:12PM +0900, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> I'm not opposed to Emacs evolving, however we lost the way to call
> non-interactively the interactive commands. I think it's a major change
> considering that it has been done for only gdb.
The immediate purpose may have been to help gdb, but I think the change is
generally useful for many commands (because it enables any interactive
command to be invoked from the command-line without change) -- whereas I
suspect the number of commands that explicitly grok the command line like w3m
does is very, very small.
-Miles
--
97% of everything is grunge
- command-line-args, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2003/09/18
- Re: command-line-args, Stefan Monnier, 2003/09/19
- Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/20
- Re: command-line-args, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/09/20
- Re: command-line-args, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2003/09/21
- Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/21
Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/20