Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>  Sorry, I don't remember what discussion we had and which
>>  code I showed you.

> For what it's worth, I think you suggested the quail-completion code
> as the basis of the `normal' completion of the quail sequences that I
> wanted. 

That's very likely.  I still think quail-completion can be
the base.

> I don't remember if it looked too complicated at the time or
> whether I didn't get round to it.

The difficulty is that the current quail-completion doesn't
update the current quail status, but the requested feature
has to update the current quail status in addition to it
must insert completed text if there's no other alternatives.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden