[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:13:47 -0500 |
So in my mind, DTWW is not an alternative to e.g. editing with
longlines mode, but on the other hand, I don't understand why you
oppose DTWW support in Emacs.
I oppose it as an alternative to longlines mode.
I don't necessarily oppose it as a way of continuing lines,
but I want to make sure it does not grow into an alternative
to longlines mode.
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, (continued)
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/28
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Miles Bader, 2005/10/29
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/30
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/30
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/31
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/31
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Miles Bader, 2005/10/31
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, David Reitter, 2005/10/31
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/26