[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recovered file has extra ^M
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Recovered file has extra ^M |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:33:31 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden writes:
>>> We could either use Qemacs_mule_unix here or change `emacs-mule' to always
>>> use LF
> > The latter alternative would be an incompatible change, so we probably
> > shouldn't make it now, to avoid breaking something that, as Murfy will
> > have it, will remain undetected until 1/2 an hour after the release.
> I thought that it would be safe because it just reverts the behavior to what
> it was before Handa-san changed it.
You are right. But, in emacs-unicode-2, emacs-mule is a
non-special coding-system, so should behaves as the others.
So, I don't see a strong reason for changing emacs-mule now
and undo that change after the release.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Recovered file has extra ^M, MIYOSHI Masanori, 2006/08/15
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/15
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/15
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/16
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/16
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/16
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/17
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/20
- Re: Recovered file has extra ^M, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21