Re: Bad effects for defcustoms without group

[Richard Stallman]

    Hi, if I execute
    (symbol-plist nil)
    I get
    (custom-group ((find-function-transform-list custom-variable)
    (LaTeX-section-hook custom-variable)) event-symbol-element-mask (nil
    0) event-symbol-elements (nil) modifier-cache ((0)))

Storing the symbol in group nil by default is not a disaster.

    The custom-group entries here are from stuff I customized myself or
    for which I am responsible myself (too bad).  They come from
    defcustoms without a corresponding group.  I don't think that this
    should cause them to be put into the (invisible) group "nil".
    Instead, we should probably have a top-level group "lost+found" which
    is visible when stray customizations exist.

    I don't know whether we already have a byte compilation warning for
    this case.

Can you test it and find out?