[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: RFE: muse: highlight =verbatim=, similar to how
From: |
Michael Olson |
Subject: |
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: RFE: muse: highlight =verbatim=, similar to how *emph* and _under_ are |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:43:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Allen Halsey <address@hidden> writes:
> These get special highlight treatment:
>
> *empasized*
>
> _underlined_
>
> They get a face and the markup characters become invisible (very cool btw!)
>
> but not so for verbatim:
>
> =verbatim=
>
> How come?
This was how John's original version of Muse treated verbatim
characters, so I followed suit for the first release. It's worth
raising the issue, however.
With emacs-wiki, the '=' signs remained in-place, but the text was
marked up using `emacs-wiki-verbatim-face', which was grayish.
Now that the first release is complete, I will implement something
similar to this.
Would it be a good thing for people to be able to specify whether the
'*', '_', and '=' characters are hidden when colorized? There are
times when I think this might be worthwhile.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: anime, Debian, XHTML, wiki, Emacs Lisp
/` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #pulug
|_] | \| |_| Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
pgpwelLAy1hJg.pgp
Description: PGP signature