emacs-wiki-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: RFE: muse: highlight =verbatim=, similar to how


From: Michael Olson
Subject: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: RFE: muse: highlight =verbatim=, similar to how *emph* and _under_ are
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:43:05 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Allen Halsey <address@hidden> writes:

> These get special highlight treatment:
>
>  *empasized*
>
>  _underlined_
>
> They get a face and the markup characters become invisible (very cool btw!)
>
> but not so for verbatim:
>
>  =verbatim=
>
> How come?

This was how John's original version of Muse treated verbatim
characters, so I followed suit for the first release.  It's worth
raising the issue, however.

With emacs-wiki, the '=' signs remained in-place, but the text was
marked up using `emacs-wiki-verbatim-face', which was grayish.

Now that the first release is complete, I will implement something
similar to this.

Would it be a good thing for people to be able to specify whether the
'*', '_', and '=' characters are hidden when colorized?  There are
times when I think this might be worthwhile.

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: anime, Debian, XHTML, wiki, Emacs Lisp
  /` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #pulug
 |_] | \| |_| Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net

Attachment: pgpwelLAy1hJg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]