[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile
From: |
Lucas Bonnet |
Subject: |
[emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:32:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tim Landscheidt <address@hidden> writes:
>> I think you'd be better of packaging the HEAD (it should be very
>> stable), or maybe waiting until we manage to release a new version,
>> sometime in 2010 :)
>
> Well, I'm waiting :-). What issues are there holding up a
> formal release?
Me lacking time, apart from that, not much.
[...]
>
>> Isn't there some sort of standardized way to guess all this stuff ? I
>> don't want the Makefile to be distro-specific. Using "$(which install-info)"
>> seems too obvious to me to be the proper way.
>
> Of course: automake :-). It's much better than reinventing
> the wheel yourself, is part of the FSF biosphere and allows
> the user every imaginable freedom to tweak everything.
That's what I was afraid of :)
I'll have a look at your patches.
Regards,
--
Lucas
pgpkojonnvN6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Lucas Bonnet, 2010/06/04
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Tim Landscheidt, 2010/06/04
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Tim Landscheidt, 2010/06/06
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Tim Landscheidt, 2010/06/06
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Lucas Bonnet, 2010/06/15
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Tim Landscheidt, 2010/06/15
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Lucas Bonnet, 2010/06/15
- [emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile, Tim Landscheidt, 2010/06/15
[emms-help] Re: Packaging as RPM and Makefile,
Lucas Bonnet <=