[Erc-discuss] Re: Generalizing erc-track?

[Michael Olson]

Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:

>>  - If there are no buffers that have changes in them, determine
>>    whether we should switch to the last non-tracked buffer.
>
> I don't understand this. Could you elaborate?

I'm assuming that only a subset of the buffers in Emacs are managed by
tracking.el.

If I am currently visiting a buffer that is managed by tracking.el,
where no buffers have had new content and appear on the mode line, and
call `tracking-next-buffer' with C-c C-SPC, and this option is
enabled, I would be taken to the last non-tracking.el-managed buffer.
If this option was not enabled, I would simply remain in the current
buffer.

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG
 |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC

pgpaNXUbC1NHP.pgp
Description: PGP signature