fab-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fab-user] fab "let" command


From: Christian Vest Hansen
Subject: Re: [Fab-user] fab "let" command
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:51:26 +0200

Poof! I just ran into this one.

Consider this a vote to get `let` back at some point.

Until then, this (probably way simplified and naïve) implementation in
my fabfile covers my needs:

def let(**kvargs):
  "Define the provided arbitrary key-value arguments as attributes in env."
  env.update(kvargs)


On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Forcier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Ben, apologies for the delay in replying!
>
> There's no replacement for the old global 'let' flag right now, but
> that's mostly because I haven't taken the time to re-examine it and
> see how such a feature fits into the new scheme of things. Something
> like that may well show up again in the future.
>
> One option that may be used as a workaround is to specify arguments to
> your tasks, e.g. "fab deploy:fixtures=my_fixture.json", which is
> equivalent to calling "deploy(fixtures='my_fixture.json')". This is
> subtly different from setting env vars directly, but can serve much
> the same purpose. The docs for this aspect of Fabric can be found
> here:
>
>    http://docs.fabfile.org/0.9/api/main.html#fabric.main.parse_arguments
>
> Otherwise, as you mentioned, you could write tasks to do this for you
> -- even make your own "let" to set env vars, which coincidentally
> would have the same syntax as the old let builtin, due to how the
> above task args feature works.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ben Davis<address@hidden> wrote:
>> One other thing I've also noticed while upgrading to 0.9,  is that the "let"
>> command no longer works.  For example, one of my commands would be
>>
>> fab staging let:fixtures=my_fixture.json deploy
>>
>> My deployment script would then set the fixtures variable and I could use
>> that in any of my functions.   Is there a way to do this w/ 0.9?  Or is it
>> just a matter of writing my own "let" command?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fab-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fab-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
>



-- 
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Christian Vest Hansen.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]