[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed change for z1load.c
|
From: |
Just van Rossum |
|
Subject: |
Re: Proposed change for z1load.c |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:41:45 +0100 |
At 8:19 AM -0400 16-10-2000, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>I would if I could guarantee that the font had a /.notdef glyph in it. When I
>was at TUG 2000, HAn The Thanh told me that he has run into fonts that have no
>/.notdef glyh in the CharStrings dictionary!
Beh... The T1 spec clearly says that a .notdef glyph is mandatory... Your
suggestion makes sense, though.
Just
- Proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/15
- Re: Proposed change for z1load.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/10/16
- Re: Proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/16
- Re: Proposed change for z1load.c,
Just van Rossum <=
- Re: Proposed change for z1load.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/10/16
- Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/16
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/16
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Leonard Rosenthol, 2000/10/16
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/16
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Leonard Rosenthol, 2000/10/16
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/10/17
- Re: Newer proposed change for z1load.c, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/10/17