Re: [Devel] new FT error scheme

[David Turner]

Hi Werner,

Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> 
> The current code like
> 
>   #define TT_Err_xxx  FT_Err_xxx
> 
> isn't really meaningful.
> 
> What do you think about the following:
> 
>   #define FT_Err_Ok   0x00
>   #define FT_Err_Foo  0x01 + FT_ERR_OFFSET
>   #define FT_Err_Bar  0x02 + FT_ERR_OFFSET
>   ...
> 
> In freetype.h:
>   #undef  FT_ERR_OFFSET
>   #define FT_ERR_OFFSET 0x000
> 
> In module foo:
> 
>   #undef  FT_ERR_OFFSET
>   #define FT_ERR_OFFSET 0x100
> 
> This would give better error codes (the high byte gives the module,
> the low byte the error code), and we could uniformly use FT_Err_*
> everywhere.
>
 
Hummm.. I don't understand your scheme. It seems that the value
of FT_Err_Foo would not be the same if you include "foo.h" or
"freetype.h", which is hardly a good idea :-)

Is that really what you meant ??

Cheers,

- David