[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:48:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "АП" == Алексей Подтележников <address@hidden> writes:
АП> Frankly, I think I am starting to notice the quality down a bit.
I agree; the second png is worse that the first. But only just a bit.
You should try ONE_PIXEL/8 as you suggested.
Or, if even ONE_PIXEL/8 proves unpleasant, perhaps a patch to fix the
comment to say that it is one 16th of a pixel might be better?
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
- [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/12
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL,
James Cloos <=
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, James Cloos, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/15
- RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/14
RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 2010/10/13