[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL |
|
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:02:37 +0200 (CEST) |
> ONE_PIXEL / 8 looks good! I hope everyone agrees that 244_8.png is
> not worse than 243_16.png. See attachments.
Thanks for testing. For me, it looks OK $(Q#|(B I can only notice
difference if I magnify the images.
If others agree, I'll check in this patch.
Werner
- [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/12
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/13
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, James Cloos, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, James Cloos, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/10/15
- RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 2010/10/14
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/10/14
RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 2010/10/13