[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] Why 26.6 ?
From: |
Laurent Lequenne |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] Why 26.6 ? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:50:54 +0200 |
Yes indeed... You're right ... So 26.6 it's definitely the best choice,
between the three options as the 26 part gives you a resolution of +/-
32.000.000x32.000.0000 pixels, this gives for a definition of 3600 pixels by
inch a resolution of 18641 inches... Nop ? I don't know how much cm is a
inch, but this makes some large paper format at high resolution. Something
that no machine can deal with :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Letocha" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: RE: [Freetype] Why 26.6 ?
> because 24.8 and 16.16 give smaller integer numbers :-) and
> the .6 gives an
> antialiasing of 64 levels that should be clearly enough, but
> it could be .8
> to have a real 256 level antialiasing, but 16 is really too much :-)
Pixels are 2D so it is 6+6=12 > 8, so it is "real" 256 levels antialiasing.
Boris
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.freetype.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype