[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] putting text in a box
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] putting text in a box |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:42:21 +0100 (CET) |
>> As I told you earlier: A negative bbox value descends below the
>> baseline (which has y=0).
>
> How could a bounding box represent both the overall size of the
> glyph and the descent at the same time?
Sorry for being imprecise. A bbox consists of four values: The (x,y)
values of the lower left (llx,lly) and the upper right (urx,ury)
corner. A box of a glyph with a descender looks like this:
(urx,ury)
+----------+
| |
| |
| |
| |
------+----------+------ baseline (y = 0)
| |
+----------+
(llx,lly)
If I say `a negative bbox value' I've meant that lly < 0; the
descender is thus simply the value of lly.
> [...] let's say its height overall is 10 pixels (which completely
> encloses top-to-bottom the glyph) and the descent is 3 pixels. How
> can both pieces of information be communicated through a box height?
Then you should have lly = -3 and ury = 7.
Hmm, I see that the description of FT_BBox doesn't mention the term
`baseline'. I've improved it now hopefully by adding this:
/* <Note> */
/* The bounding box is specified with the coordinates of the lower */
/* left and the upper right corner. In PostScript, those values are */
/* often called (llx,lly) and (urx,ury), respectively. */
/* */
/* If `yMin' is negative, this value gives the glyph's descender. */
/* Otherwise, the glyph doesn't descend below the baseline. */
/* Similarly, if `ymax' is positive, this value gives the glyph's */
/* ascender. */
Werner
- [ft] putting text in a box, Dave Calkins, 2010/01/19
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/19
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Dave Calkins, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Dave Calkins, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, dave, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, dave, 2010/01/20
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- RE: [ft] putting text in a box, David Bevan, 2010/01/21
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/21
- RE: [ft] putting text in a box, David Bevan, 2010/01/21
- Message not available
- RE: [ft] putting text in a box, dave, 2010/01/21
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/23
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, dave, 2010/01/21
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Dave Calkins, 2010/01/21
- Re: [ft] putting text in a box, Dave Calkins, 2010/01/21