[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slush
From: |
Mike Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ... |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:46:41 +1000 |
Hi Camm.
| We should probably instead default to
|
| GCL (GNU Common Lisp) (2.6.1) Fri Feb 20 16:31:57 UTC 2004
| GCL source licensed under GNU Library General Public License
| This binary licensed under the GPL due to the inclusion of
| the following external GPL'ed features: unexec, libbfd, readline
| Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license
| Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter
|
| This list could be generated from elements in the *features* list put
| in at compile time depending on the selected options.
|
| Thoughts, (but not flames :-)) most appreciated.
I think that this is a sensible approach except that the part about the
source should perhaps read:
"GCL source licensed under GNU Library General Public License except for
unexec, libbfd and readline which are under GNU General Public License."
The source licencing statement should not be tied to the features list as
the source tree contains all components as distributed.
I also would like to see, for the sake of convenience, the version displayed
as "2.6.1 ANSI" or "2.6.1 CLtL1" depending on the value of the configure.in
variable @CLSTANDARD@ which is already being used in the Windows installer
script to generate differentiable package names.
Cheers
Mike Thomas.
- [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>] Re: GCL getting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/20
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>] Re: GCLgetting slushy ..., Mike Thomas, 2004/02/22
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>] Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Mike Thomas, 2004/02/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>] Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/23
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Mike Thomas, 2004/02/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak" <address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/24
- [Gcl-devel] Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., C Y, 2004/02/24
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ...,
Mike Thomas <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Dennis Decker Jensen, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw, Michael Koehne, 2004/02/25
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw, Mike Thomas, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw, C Y, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon Shaw Novak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/25
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon ShawNovak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Mike Thomas, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gcl-devel] ["Gordon ShawNovak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Camm Maguire, 2004/02/26
- RE: [Gcl-devel] ["GordonShawNovak"<address@hidden>]Re:GCLgetting slushy ..., Mike Thomas, 2004/02/26