[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:49:57 -0500 |
If people are proposing that we should change the way this
part of the GNU system is maintained, the first question is,
is there really a problem? What useful features or improvements
does the GNU system lack, which it could have had if
GDB maintenance were done differently? How important are these
features?
- [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Joel Brobecker, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/28
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/01/29
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29