[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
|
Date: |
29 Jan 2004 08:38:58 +0200 |
> From: Ian Lance Taylor <address@hidden>
> Date: 28 Jan 2004 16:03:57 -0500
>
> Consensus or tyranny are better methods. If it is impossible for the
> relevant maintainers to come to a consensus, and if the tyranny
> becomes unacceptable, then there is a problem with the current set of
> maintainers.
And how would you propose to resolve such a problem?
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/27
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/28
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Message not availableRe: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/29