[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 02:50:57 -0500 |
Voting is for a last resort conflict resolution, not
for everyday approval. The central point of the proposal
is that blanket write maintainers have the authority to
approve patches in any part of gdb, even if there is an
area maintainer assigned to that part.
This suggests an smaller change that might address the issue just as
well: assign more area maintainers to whichever areas are not
reviewing patches fast enough. If the GDB Maintainers make sure there
are enough area maintainers in every area, things should work
smoothly. Some global maintainers could be chosen as secondary area
maintainers, to review patches in those areas when the main area
maintainers don't. Some new people could also become area
maintainers.
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, (continued)
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/29
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/27
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/28
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/29