[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_st
|
From: |
Benjamin Wolsey |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_start-173-g1373211 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:19:22 +0100 |
Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 15:56 +0100 schrieb Sandro Santilli:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:48:31PM +0000, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
>
> > -/// This design is uncomfortable when it comes to programmatically
> > -/// created DisplayObjects, in that they do NOT have any *fixed*
> > definition.
> > -/// A possible workaround to this would be not *requiring* DisplayObject
> > -/// instances to have an associated DefinitionTag. I'll work on this
> > -/// --strk 2006-12-05.
>
> So you think I wont' work on it eh ? :P
The main reason for deleting the comment was that DisplayObjects haven't
been required to have an associated definition since about 2009, so
there's nothing left to work on!
--
--
Free Flash, use Gnash
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/
Benjamin Wolsey, Software Developer - http://benjaminwolsey.de
C++ and Open-Source Flash blog - http://www.benjaminwolsey.de/bwysblog
xmpp:address@hidden
http://identi.ca/bwy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part