[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] remoting
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] remoting |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:52:19 +0200 |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:45:17AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> strk wrote:
> >
> >Agreed. It's just the "replace" idea I'm against.
> >Adding RTMP is good.
> >Best if keeping the IOChannel abstraction for final use.
>
> Ideally, yes. Abstractions like that are usually good, although
> IOChannel may need to evolve some to support the 64 I/O channels used in
> a single RTMP connection, plus to handle sending Camera and Microphone
> AMF objects to a server.
Could they be up to 64 distinct IOChannel instances obtained from an RTMP
client handle ?
--strk;