[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API
From: |
Rob Savoye |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:56:43 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 06/04/10 08:46, strk wrote:
> The 'check' API is just a wrapper around the Dejagnu one, so there's
> nothing lost by using it, only additional features.
I still prefer to not use it for the testcases I work on.
> are of no use except making cooperation harder, so please, if you
> belive in open development models, try to avoid them.
I'm just trying to suggest we avoid arguing over this issue and just
keep doing what we're already doing. We've had this testing API
discussion before, actually several times. When you talk about
cooperation, one thing is to avoid arguing over trivial issues, and to
focus on the areas we agree.
There is much work to be done to Gnash, and I'm glad to see the
ExternalInterface code cleanup and the calm discussion of it's details.
Now that is cooperation the way it's supposed to be.
- rob -
- [Gnash-dev] ExternalInterface tests, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] ExternalInterface tests, strk, 2010/06/04
- [Gnash-dev] Testing API (was: ExternalInterface tests), strk, 2010/06/04
- [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Rob Savoye, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, strk, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Rob Savoye, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, strk, 2010/06/04