[Gnewsense-dev] question about bug #109

[crap0101]

Hi!

reading the bug's page of bug #109 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00109
cracklib2 seems not free (and it was removed) due its unclear licence.
But this bug is signed like a dupe of bug 99:
http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00099
where, in Brian's opinion, the Artistic Licence [1], despite its lack of
clearness [2], seems free.

So, how manage these opposite sentences?


thanks,


[1] Version < 2.0, is not the same licence of cracklib, but they are
similar ->
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/c/cracklib2/cracklib2_2.7-19/cracklib2.copyright
[2]
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ArtisticLicense

signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente