Re: [Gnewsense-dev] question about bug #109

[crap0101]

Il giorno mer, 08/07/2009 alle 01.05 +0200, crap0101 ha scritto:
> Hi!
> 
> reading the bug's page of bug #109 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00109
> cracklib2 seems not free (and it was removed) due its unclear licence.
> But this bug is signed like a dupe of bug 99:
> http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00099
> where, in Brian's opinion, the Artistic Licence [1], despite its lack of
> clearness [2], seems free.
> 
> So, how manage these opposite sentences?
[...]


well, gnufs find the newest version of cracklib are been re-licensed
under the GNU GPL v2:
http://cracklib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cracklib/trunk/cracklib/README-LICENSE?view=markup
 

> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
-- 
--------------------------------------
me -> http://crap0101.gnu-darwin.org/
--------------------------------------
--

signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente