Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: [KFV] mrouted licence

[crap0101]

sorry, i've trim some text :)


about http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00287

After a comparison between mroute.h and the source mrouted tarball i
think the code in the former only mimic the mrouted structures and
definitions for source compatibility purpose (like stated in the first
comment); indeed, i haven’t found blocks of code copied from the
latter. 

Therefore, are you think is safe to have it?

thanks,
m.


-- 
me -> http://crap0101.gnu-darwin.org

signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente