[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments
From: |
Ted Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:48:53 -0400 |
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 07:11 +0100, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -
wrote:
> Ted Smith wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:01 +0000
> >> Eric Morey <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I found this post and comments on Vrms to interesting:
> >>> http://blog.nizarus.org/2009/09/are-you-a-100-free-user
> >>>
> >>> Eric...
> >
> nice one ted
> >
> > RMS would certainly not agree with (much of) this output.
>
> some guy called ompaul made a comment about it on the web page pointing
> out that we kind of IGNORE IT COMPLETELY but it seems he was wrong.. ;-)
>
> MOST of us ignore it. ;-)
>
Actually, there's a long history (going back to Gobuntu) of trying to
reform VRMS. It's never really taken off.
All it would take is a small bit of ubuntu-ization to make the behavior
correct in Ubuntu (which uses the FSF designation of freedom) and
gNewSense. Nobody wants to write the perl code, I guess. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Eric Morey, 2009/09/10
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Karl Goetz, 2009/09/10
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Ted Smith, 2009/09/10
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -, 2009/09/11
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments,
Ted Smith <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Karl Goetz, 2009/09/11
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Ted Smith, 2009/09/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -, 2009/09/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Ted Smith, 2009/09/13
- [OT] ohh I say read a book Re: [gNewSense-users] Vrms Comments, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -, 2009/09/13